When your new vague rules mean shortstacks are illegal now - Comment #6,151,352

Is that what you're worrying? That it's going to cause people to go after the real thing? I honestly don't believe that. I mean we have a lot of messed up cases like these ones where the person was obsessed with Halloween movies:

Or someone obsessed with one of the character's from MLP:

Or these kind of cases:

Even then, we aren't going to ban or censor Halloween, MLP or any other horror movies and stop all the Furry cons and ban Furries just because of these few sick fucks or do we?

you're still falsely equating furry to loli, which I think is funny and disgusting. the lengths you seem to go to in order to defend fucking LOLI PORNOGRAPHY of all things is disturbing. the removal and censorship of loli is a good thing and something that needs to be pushed for.
don't know why you tried to push the "umm ashktually loli is popular and therefore is good" angle by posting stats from Japanese art websites where that stuff is tolerated. the damn near entirety of the internet would agree with me that loli is abhorrent.

Halloween isn't a porno film meant to make murder erotic

"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all."

- H.L. Mencken

You seem unable to tell fiction from reality.

By your logic, violent video games make people into murderers, because it's fun to shoot people in video games, and by that logic, it's fun to murder people IRL.

Fuck right off, you puritanical jackass.

Jesus H. Christ.

A shooter brony being that delusional about hoping to see a fictional character in the afterlife…

Guy must be rotting for eternity in the afterlife due to the lack of a talking southern, apple tree-buckin' horse.

I agree but my point was that this movie still inspired some crazies to murder others. You can just read how obsessed they were with these kind of movies but we still don't censor or ban these type of movies, we don't say that "these movies normalized murdering people and should be banned forever now".

So why do we have people insisting that lolis will somehow cause people to go after real children? That it's going to normalize pedophilia somehow? I mean, if you or 9InchGag have some data to show that liking lolis can lead someone to do some very illegal and fucked up shit to someone in real life, then i am happy to change my mind. So far i have not seen any kind of proof though. All i found was this long ass thread of people who have called lolicons pedophiles getting exposed as being pedophiles themselves. Not assuming anything though, just interesting how often it seems to happen.

I don't know how you can call it a false equivalence when it is literally the same line of thinking.

"If it looks like a kid, talks like a kid then it's probably a kid and you're a pedophile for liking it."

"If it looks like a horse, talks like a horse then it's probably a horse but that doesn't actually make you a zoophile for some strange reason."

There is no evidence that lolicon or MLP/furry porn leads people into pedophilia/zoophilia but you're more than willing to believe the former can for what reason exactly?

Like lolicon and the like is gross as fuck but at least keep the logic consistent if you want to play moral crusader here.

I've always found there's a critical difference between any such examples, which explains how the exact same logic works in one case but not the other.

They're into one of them.