Social Justice Warrior - SJW Argument on Censorship

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

How SJWs s DefenccENSORSHIFP Only the government can censor things," "you don't know what censorship is there's no law saying these changes had to be made," "it's not censorship!" f ideas and art. Censorship doesn't have to be enforced by law or carried out by government u don't need to file a lawsuit to censor something. SJWs are trying to redefine what "censorship is so it conviently lets them off the hook when they try to censor things that are not politically correct according to their ideologies "The game devs chose to make the change, not SJWs," "you don't know why they removed that content." SJWs are trying to pla Fatal Frame 5 as an example, we know for a fact that the developers wanted the bikini and lingerie costumes in the game because both costumes made it into the final Japanese release of the game. If they didn't want it in the game, they wouldn't have put it in the final version of the game. It was removed from the American release, and there's costumes problematic: SJWs. The same group of people who wrote defamation articles on DOAX2 for se cases of DOAX3 and Compile Hearts, the developers outright stated that SJW shitflining was the reason the game would not be released in the west. With Hatred and Yohjo Simulator, SJWs directly got the games pulled from distribut nocent after builiding a career around politically charged smear campaigns against video games. Using y one group of Americans who would find the “Anime t------! Serious business!" “Don't take away my bikini waifus!" "You're just a pervert! SJWs are trying to excuse censorship by belittling the significance of the very thing being censored. When NewSouth Book decided to remove the word 'n-----' from Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn, people didn't get upset because they like reading the word n-----, and when a fig leaf was placed over Michelangelo's Statue of David, people didn't get upset because they liked looking at t important, it's the censorship itself that people care about. The f ideas and art is what upsets people. SJWs cen ren David's micropenis for being "obscene It's just boobs/blood being censored," "most of the game is still there," "a little censorship is okay What constitutes as a little' censorship? Where do we draw the line between what an 'acceptable level of censorship' is versus an acceptable amount of censorship?' Is it okay to censor a bikini but it okay to remove an obscene gesture but not a sexual innuendo? How about removing an entire character, or an entire side-quest? It is impossible to measure what an 'acceptable el of censorship' is. 'A little censorship' is u able, because so long as people can point out that ad worse censorship than this!' the harder it will be to convince people to leave future games in tact. It's trash anyway. Who cares if trash is censored? SJWs don't realize when the y "who cares if trash is censored?" they are admitting t they condone censorship. I ntain na side and I think it's stupid, but that doesn't mea have the right to exist. Duchamp's Fountain is now the de facto example when people discuss what con for that reason it's a significant work, but it's still trash. The film 'Troll 2' is also trash, but it's gained a cult following and many people enjoy it for how trashy it is. I would argue that rassic World' is trash too, bu t be trash to someone else, and just because it's trash do s grossed over a billion dollars worldwide. The "It's paedophilia!" "Are you a paedo?! I bet you are!" s of paedophilia to cover up three very important things: these games depicting 'underage n the first place (Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyball, Yohjo Simulator, Xenoblade characters never contained nudity o Chronicles X, Blade & Soul, etc). Even if they did contain underage nudity, they wouldn't constitute as child p----------, this is how movies like Blue Lagoon and books like Nabok Lastly, they're not real people. Fictional characters don't have You should boycott the game developers for being cowards and letting SJWs tell them what to do. We should boycott the victims of oppress ? This rhetoric is especially funny because not buying games that are s ex o do in the first place. So instead of boycotting them for being cis-scum pigs, now we u are stupid enough to boycott games uld boycott them for being scared of I u want un-censored ing their job from the SJW menace. SJWs thin You're the one censoring game developers by demanding fanservice!" Notice how literally no one is demanding Naughty Dog add bikinis to The L Bloodborne. This is because these games ne and lingerie costumes in them, they aren't demanding the game be changed to suit their preferences, they're demanding the game n the first place. When people demand Fatal Frame 5 have the biki red form, as the game creator origin ended. SJWs are so dumb they think you can cen demanding their work be uncensored "They're not really censored," "it's a marketing tactic, you idiot!" "you're falling for their viral marketing! This conspiracy theory is especially prev and they're generating fake controversy. There is no proof to support this theory but let's debunk it anyway. SJWs pretend that t with Dead or Alive Xtreme 3. SJWs think Team Ninja and Play-Asia are in cahoots rev s DOAX titles sold poorly in the west, when in fact the old better in the west. The idea that Team Ninja is making a decision' to not sell their game to thei rgest market, and this will somehow cause them to make more mo Also, I don't think there are many people 'on the fence' about getting DOAX3, but now due to the controversy have chosen to import yball games or u don't. Who waits for controversy to buy a game? Ironic how SJWs get accused of censorship and then anti-SJWs try to censor them." SJWs think you're too stupid to know the difference between expressing an opin t Gone Home or Her Story pulled from Steam. No one tried to censor Dragon Age: Inqu claiming it was harmful to society. Nobody deleted the hundreds of Indivisible threads begging for funds. Disagreeing with a SJW is ng a SJW. Yo o one by disagreeing with them They're just bloggers. They have no influence or real power," "SJWs didn't censor anyone because they cannot censor anyone u cannot pretend SJWs have no power when they have done the following: gotten Grand Theft Auto 5 pulled from Target and gotten Hatred pulled from Steam for being too viole hjo Simulator pulled from Steam, prevented DOAX3 from being released in the we spread libel about the game developers of Hatred being Nazis, gotten prevented Compile Hearts from localizing games in the west, completely rewrote side-quests in Blade & Soul, and Ben Bateman (@Benspants) gloated on Twitter about his ability to censor "racism/sexism" in video games. Let's not forget that Gawker Media, the main employer of those SJWs bloggers, is a $300,000,000 company and the United States 45th most popular online property. You cannot claim SJWs have no power when they are a multi-million dollar conglomerate who control the video game industry

View Gallery Random Image

Top Comments

alenius

Dec 10, 2015 at 11:00AM EST in reply to Black Graphic T

Probably because SJWs don't really care about games at all.

+18

Mistress Fortune

Dec 10, 2015 at 01:24PM EST in reply to Lenny Guy

To be honest I found people calling for boycotts of games like Fatal Frame 5 and Xenoblade Chronicles X to be really stupid. Mainly because I highly doubt you're sending the right message at all by doing that. By boycotting those games I think the message Nintendo is going to take away from it is "well I guess people just don't want anymore horror games or JRPGs in the West" and effectively we're back to begging for localizations like this is the freaking 1990s or early 00s all over again.

+17

+ Add a Comment