Meme Encyclopedia
Images
Editorials
More
GotFunnyPictures is the property of Literally Media ©2024 Literally Media. All Rights Reserved.

491 Views Created 9 years ago By TehDoh • Updated 6 years ago

Created By TehDoh • Updated 6 years ago

In short, some of the private thoughtsI shared in the wake of Gjoni's blog post crossed the line, and i apologize for airing them. It was an error in judgment I want to be clear that none of this affected Ars' other coverage. I don't have any kind of final say about what gets published on Ars Technica, and the two posts that Ars did on the "GamerGate" controversy were separately suggested by Culture Editor Casey Johnston, who had tracked the issue on her own and worked directly on her pieces with senior Ars editors. As noted above, the decision to review Depression Quest had already been made before any controversy had arisen. (Due to my lapse in judgment on this matter, going forwardI will refrain from writing about or providing editorial support to any further pieces published on "GamerGate,"Quinn, or Depression Quest at Ars.) This is from Ars Technica Is this article mainstream enough for inclusion?-Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmyLine (talk contribs) 01:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC) to include what? "The creator of a journalist discussion group apologized for suggesting that journalists should stand up against harassment" or "Gamergaters conspiracy theories of journalistic collusion were proven to be yet another point where they were wrong" ?- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of D 2:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC) .コAdmin Edit Conflict The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. lready being discussed above TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC) I noted something when browsing the Edit History for the page here. From what it looks, Tarc randomly rolled back Suggestion: Focus on Ongoing Controversy, not it's Origin or Historjy The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the Please use one of the many other existing sections about this subject. Please keep in mind our policy WP:UNDUE which will inform how we present content TRPoD ska The Red Pen of Doom 18:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC) appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion In the introduction to this article it devotes a lot of space to the origins of the controversy (e.g. Quinn). Why not cut the history of the controversy out of the introduction and isolate it to a sub-section concerning GG's history/origins? The introduction is way too long, and focusing on the controversy itself rather than it's origins would help cull the Wikipedia: Fair and BalancedT When have biased radicals ever colluded to shut down discussion, really now? Blocker (Mr. Fart) @FartToContinue 4h #GamerGate Reply 다 Retweet ★ Favorite
Origin Entry:

GamerGate


Notes

Textile Embed
!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/839/450/e62.jpg!

Comments ( 3 )

Sorry, but you must activate your account to post a comment.